World Volunteer Web Home  
Volunteerism worldwide: News, views & resources
  Home   About us   Contact us   Contribute   Search   Sitemap 
 
Email page   Email page            Print page
Is volunteering just for the privileged few?
07 December 2005
by Tom Geoghegan

When Prince Harry spent part of his gap year working in poverty-stricken Lesotho, he helped build foundations for a new health clinic, completed a road bridge and dug trenches for crops.

Not only was this a fantastic experience for a 20-year-old, it was a great advert for volunteering - good for the CV, good for the soul and good for the village.

In a tradition more commonly encouraged at public schools, others have beaten a similar path to the developing world to help out, as if continuing a strong sense of duty, a "noblesse oblige", long associated with the upper class.

Many more people choose something worthy closer to home. And although putting in the unpaid hours at a local care home may not have the African scenery as enticement, it does have similar career benefits and the added satisfaction of helping the community where you live.

But the prospect of unwaged employment might not be so appealing if you're a cash-strapped school leaver who wants to help mum put food on the table. And for young people facing the financial burden of student loans, the need to earn during a gap year is all the more urgent.

Gordon Brown tried to address this problem in his pre-Budget report when he promised up to £100m for "volunteering in Britain and abroad for young people who could not otherwise afford this".

Prison, anyone?

The cash, from dormant bank accounts, will help to implement the proposals of the Russell Commission, set up in 2004 to encourage young people from disadvantaged backgrounds to volunteer, in the hope it would provide a way into further education and employment.

The £100m, £50m of which is matched pound for pound by businesses, will fund new volunteering opportunities and raise awareness of it in deprived communities. And in recognition of the financial difficulties, a £60 weekly "wage" will cover living expenses.

 

The Tories are banging a similar drum. New leader David Cameron wants a national school leaver programme for people to spend three or four months doing "something that has public service at its heart". Although there is compulsion here, the plan enshrines the voluntary sector ethic of making a difference.

Volunteering is an industry estimated to be worth £22.6bn a year to the UK economy and encompassing half the population. For example, voluntary help at GP surgeries has been calculated to reduce hospital appointments by a third.

There are gaps in the volunteering industry - prisons and hospitals don't have the same attraction as tree-planting, for example. But momentum has been building this year with the government campaign Year of the Volunteer, which has received more than a billion minutes in volunteer pledges on its website.

Yet the efforts by politicians to widen the appeal of giving something back suggests many people are not reaping the benefits of taking part.

Middle-class ghetto

That's because it's more accessible to the affluent, says Caroline Diehl, chief executive of Media Trust, which is one of the Year of the Volunteer partners.

"It's easier for the middle class because there's probably a parental expectation, it's easier because there may be parental support, it's easier because of the networking, the access and the knowledge will be there," she says.

"It's not about a lack of interest among disadvantaged young people, it's more a lack of knowledge and financial resources. In communicating volunteering opportunities we haven't really reached out to those young people."

But it's no longer a middle-class ghetto and there are organisations doing a great job in getting disadvantaged youngsters involved, she says. And volunteering does not have to be full-time, so it can accommodate paid work.

WRVS is a national charity that helps people who feel isolated or lonely. It has made great strides in cities like Sheffield and Birmingham to recruit volunteers from the unemployed or from black and ethnic minorities, sometimes with help from a diversity officer with good contacts in the community.

"The key to living a fulfilled life, whatever background, is to widen your horizons, whether you've gone to Eton and you suddenly realise there's another side of life, or you've been brought up in a poor estate in Hackney," says Ms Diehl.

"It's also about being given the opportunity to show you can make a difference. So many young people grow up thinking they have nothing to offer."

Change for good

Anthony Reid's story would have Messrs Brown and Cameron purring in delight. The 19-year-old says volunteering saved him from a life of waywardness on the streets of Derby.

He completed 200 hours of voluntary football coaching intermittently over six months, and now he's in part-time paid work running a football course for disadvantaged youngsters.

"I would probably have been doing nothing, getting up to no good, if it wasn't for the Millennium Volunteers," he says. "The truth is I couldn't see myself volunteering and I would have said no but I didn't have any other work and at the time I wasn't interested in anything else but sport. It's got me a lot further than I expected."

But for others, the prospect of no wages does put them off. Mustafa Field, who runs the SAM youth club in north London for people from disadvantaged and refugee communities, says volunteering schemes like the Scarman Trust and Millennium Volunteers have been hugely beneficial to some people at his club - but there are barriers.

"It can be difficult to sell, especially to people from disadvantaged communities," he says. "They need part-time jobs and struggle to find them so they need incentives like sponsorship or money towards education.

"The families don't understand why they're doing it and can't see the benefit so they're not with them. We have problems with some families that wouldn't encourage their kids to get involved in volunteering."

And as a Muslim, he says, he recognises the need to get more female Muslims participating because the volunteer groups are dominated by men and they are the ones who take the initiative.

"We're trying to change that but it's very slow. They need to have incentives and there needs to be education from families."

From: BBC News, UK
© BBC News
More about: Infrastructure


  User Comments        Add a comment

Posted by: Phuong Nguyen   Date: 09 January 2006 17:15   From: Vietnam
I never believe those celebrities when they state that they are doing some kind of volunteering job in a developing country. It's just a good way to polish their CV, polish their reputation - some kind of joke.

Come on, what kind of volunteerism is that when they do things with a lot of huge bodyguards around? What kind of volunteerism is that when they are dressed in stuff from fashion house worth thousands of dollars? What kind of volunteerism is that when after meeting some poor people, they come back to some 5-star hotels? What kind of volunteerism is that when they travel from place to place in helicopters or good and expensive vehicle?

I think, instead of doing volunteering job, they'd better stay at their cribs and just donate their money. It's much better!!!


Posted by: Alistair   Date: 09 January 2006 19:26   From: Norwich, UK
I have just read this article and I do agree with the author, but only to a certain degree. Everything is being done for young people, more so now. This is a good thing as they are our future but what about the in the middle people? I am over thirty years old, spent most of my life on benefit and would love the idea of getting back to work. I love the idea of volunteering but again like what the article is saying there is no financial resources for people like me. I have no formal qualifications, no disabilities, thirty-nine years old. In short people within my age group, that is twenty-five to forty who are fit and healthy do not have any help. If you have some form of disability you will receive help and encouragement to do volunteer work, if you are young you will receive help there also. Sometimes I feel left out of any opportunities. I see people in other sectors of the community being recognised. I do not think or feel that I am the only one who feels this, (certainly hope not). Volunteering abroad is much more difficult than over here. Most orginisations are looking for skilled professionals but somebody who has nothing to offer has to pay their own way. I have looked on various websites for volunteering in another country and have been put off by their specifications. I hope this has all made sense.

Posted by: Alan   Date: 10 January 2006 06:26   From: Shoalhaven, Australia
Without a large % of non urban population of Australia "volunteering" as they do, the place would come to a stop. We ENJOY assisting the community.

Posted by: Nonofo Mopipi   Date: 10 January 2006 10:05   From: Botswana
I am a very strong believer in helping other less privildged. Helping people should be be determind by how deep our pockets are. We should help other people from the bottom of our hearts with no expectations. I am not in a state to judge who has the right to volunteer or not, but all I can say is that volunteering depends on an individual. Do you really want to leave your work (whatever you do) and go and dedicate yout time to someone else's well being? Is it really worthwhile?

Thse are the questions we should ask ourselves before we all go into volunteering. Imagine how many innocent children suffer injustices one way or the other in any part of the world. If there is someone out there priviledged or not who could help them, then we should let them do it. For there to be a global development, children should be our main concern. Let's help children and develop them, then our countries will develop and surely the world will become a better place for all. LOVE CHILDERN ENOUGH TO GIVE OUR SOUL FOR THEM!!!!


Posted by: Chii Egbuchulam   Date: 10 January 2006 10:19   From: Portharcourt, Nigeria
Let's not give so much knock or have a sweeping suspicion on the rich and the privileged who give their time to do volunteer work as some of them have genuine motivation or divine inspiration as it were to do what they are doing.

I believe the widening gap between the rich and poor especially in developing countries is responsible for this kind of thinking.

World agencies and major stakeholders should embark on massive enlightenment on the 'benefits' of caring for our fellow human being and also give adequate incentives via training, recognition, allowances, opportunity of travel and social interaction for the not so privileged who inspite of daunting challenges elect to help put a smile on the face of another world citizen.


Posted by: INYANG JOSEPH   Date: 10 January 2006 10:33   From: Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
I partially agree with Phuong Nguyen's observation but that is not an isuue. The issue is the primary motive of the volunteers which to me, I think is based on "True Love". True love, not the quest for fame, power or social recognition, is the highest basis for service, creativity and leadership.

I want to declare categorically that, any volunteer offering any kind of service with a view to achieving, fame, power, or profit at the expense of others places the self-maintaining purpose ahead of the higher purpose, and this is a violation of the natural law. Having said this, I see nothing wrong in better equipping societies or people who are more altruistic in order to handle challenges.


Posted by: Mary    Date: 10 January 2006 19:03   From: South Africa
Having been on a volunteer programme for one year, I have made several observations about volunteerism and volunteer organizations. One is that, a majority of organizations that work with international volunteers focus on offering opportunities to people in the richer countries. Reason? I would assume they are more likely to afford the fees etc than their counterparts in developing countries, which of course is true. I am therefore answering the discussion question with a yes, especially in poor countries.

Two: If, the organizations’ interest is indeed to foster individual as well as community development , they should also offer packages for volunteers from developing countries to acquire some new skills and experience (which they will take back home to contribute to the development of their communities) through volunteerism in another part of the world - the developed countries. Isn’t that one of the intrinsic benefits of volunteerism? ie development of self? Could it be argued they have nothing to offer to the developed world? While I appreciate the dedication of international volunteers-having been one myself, I am of the view we should try it the other way round.

Three: Some volunteer organizations pay quite a generous ‘living allowance’ to their volunteers such that the volunteers ‘earn’ much more than the local average salary. Should such volunteers be called ‘volunteers’ when they are actually ‘earning’ more than they would have earned in regular employment?


Posted by: Kopi   Date: 11 January 2006 10:16   From: Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
I totaly agree with the autor of this article. The reson behind such assumption is that when volunteer organisations appeal for volunteers for different needs over the world or to sustain certain projects here and there, thousands of CVs are sent, including of those from poor background. But despite school qualifications and work experience from candidates from poor background, if not sponsored, few candidates are considered. Only because there is a risk of doubting of the will of the candidate to serve as a volunteer, and the assumption that the candididate has applied for salary or social recognition.

Posted by: Vinod   Date: 11 January 2006 13:42   From: 
Dear Volunteers

Question asked, today, is "Is Volunteering for the rich only?"

Having volunteered for over 10 years, in poor areas of fluid security and post-war countries, I too believe that overseas volunteering is a fashion that only rich can afford. There are millions and millions of philanthropist organizations and NGOs seeking volunteers, who pay the prescribed fee, to participate in some activity in areas and communities that can do without their services. The nature of programs, projects and community services are garnished to attract donors and grant providers. The emphasis is on " Sell more poverty and get more grants" or 'fancier the publicity fancier the money coming". Heavyweight words like altruism, development, most vulnerable beneficiary and many more such expressions remain good on paper. More of my observations later. And have u noticed? Almost all the chosen ones, 'Miss Universes' or 'Miss Worlds' prefer to participate in humanitarian work! And this humanitarian act starts and ends in some slick five star hotel where fund raising are arranged. No?

Happy volunteering

Love to all

Vinod . S

Poor Volunteer


Posted by: Jill Napier   Date: 11 January 2006 14:07   From: Australia
Maybe poorer people need more opportunities attracting a reasonable pay. UN volunteers attract a salary which many from developing countries find so attractive they leave family behind to pursue this work.

Posted by: Mahtarr A. Jallow   Date: 11 January 2006 14:13   From: 
I do not think so, for the rich and the privileged are so anti-poor that they cannot be honest volunteers. Try the simple people with the skills necessary to do the job rather than focusing your time and energy to the rich and famous. They are not interested in the suffering masses of the world, they need publicity, and you are giving them the publicity. If they want to, they can give money fine.

Give the simple the chance they will do a good job. I know they will, I worked as a teacher volunteer in East Africa and in West Africa, but I have been rendered useless by the UNV. I have the skills and the courage to work in the field. Because one is not socially and politically connected does not mean that they are useless.

Mahtarr A. Jallow


Posted by: james may   Date: 11 January 2006 14:59   From: Novi Sad, Serbia
Volunteering is always about money - it is only not about money for the smallest number. For many wage labour is as much a means of funding 'volunteering' as volunteering is a punctuation mark the CVs of those who can supposedly afford it. As Alan from Shoalhaven, Australia, commented in this forum, volunteering is taking part in society beyond your own needs. Alan noted that without 'volunteering' "the place [urban Australia] would come to a stop". Dressing 'helping others out' as volunteerism is half the problem. All kinds of people 'volunteer' on an ad hoc basis all the time.

Here things work slightly differently to Australia but nothing of much good would start without 'volunteers' - and everything good has volunteer work, or work beyond that of your job description, at its heart. Most people are not striding to make other peoples lives better - in the mold of middle class 20-something crusaders ambling through exotic jungles we so often get caught up in when talking about volunteering. Rather, they work to make their own lives better, for the health of their society and for their futures (and not in a manner which benefits their future via a shining Curriculum Vitea).

Volunteering - doing something in the community that needs to be done for the health of society - is not something that one does because it is financially viable. It is done because it matters and a way is found to make it viable. Everyone I know involved in volunteering have jobs, some pleasant, others less so, which supports their work - money is just something that comes in and goes out. The small - financially elite - group of people you refer to are not the ones that matter, anyway. They are the periphery of a much larger corpus which in most countries we refer to as social and political activists, members of organised, if not always recognised, institutions. There is little difference between someone here who works two bar jobs to support themselves while they 'volunteer' [generate a new society] and a doctor or lawer in New York or Paris who does pro bono work on the side. This is just how life functions...


Posted by: Kimberly   Date: 11 January 2006 20:12   From: USA
Here in the U.S. volunteering isn't just for the rich. I've found that low-income individuals volunteer but they don't call it volunteering. They help out neighbors as needed, work and help out when needed at church, etc. The things I've found and seen in disadvantaged communities is a spirit of tribe. People see a need and are there. Now if you're talking about these individuals volunteering in areas far away from where they live then you're exactly right. They help those whom they see, work with, pray with on a daily basis.

Posted by: Tanya   Date: 12 January 2006 05:49   From: Australia
I think that the premise that wealthier people cannot be 'true' volunteers is entirely false. I work in a Volunteer Referral Service, and have had the opportunity to see the diverse motivations people have to volunteer. Volunteering is no longer a purely altruistic act, and many people look to volunteer work to advance their job prospects- this does not make their efforts any less valid! Perhaps we are lucky here in Australia where people on benefits are actively encouraged and supported to participate in volunteer work. People from all demographics (economic, cultural) are active.

Posted by: Brienne Armstrong   Date: 12 January 2006 11:14   From: France
Growing up middle class in Canada, my family always firmly believed in helping the under privileged. Whether it be donating money, items or resources. It seemed like no matter the amount given- it was never enough and there was always more to be done. Which I took with me when I left home.

However, now at the age of 24 I found myself realizing there's a lot more to it than "wanting to lend a hand". You have to ask yourself if you are financially able to. Doesn't that defeat the point of helping others? It should be second nature and thus, have plenty of resources out there for the ones who want to help. I'm almost done school, no real responsibilities, and plentiful time on my hands. However, now being separated from the

family's money, I find myself in a bind. Not only would I have to pay for the traveling to the countries in need of aid, but also my shelter, food and other necessities on top of that. So another educated, strong willed woman with a big heart is yet again denied of a responsibility that could make a difference in our world.

Because of work, my boyfriend and I are living in France. Our year is from September till April, and we're lucky enough to have the summer months off. How does one "volunteer", while keeping their place of residence, pay for school and for the needs through the volunteer months?? Easy- they have to be rich. There is absolutely no way around it, unless the government subsidizes those who want to help. There are reports all the time highlighting "volunteers needed!"; those volunteers are out there. They have the resources, time and heart for you- they just can't afford the amount needed to help.

What's wrong with this scenario? Most of the time it's the bigwigs that are making the money and can't seem to find enough time on their hands to help - maybe they should be paying the way of the less privileged to do the work.

Please we need to figure out a plan so that everybody wins, most importantly those in need.

Fed up and Frustrated in France


Posted by: Grégoire Koku Dulassame   Date: 18 January 2006 11:59   From: Kpalime TOGO
Thank you for the large work done. When I read this view I want to be a volunteer but don't know how to join with you . So help us to achieve this project.

HAPPY NEW YEAR FOR ALL VOLUNTEERS


Posted by: Carlos   Date: 18 January 2006 15:01   From: Argentina, América Latina
Amigos:

Me resulta absolutamente contradictorio hablar de voluntariado entre los carenciados. Y mucho más absurdo es plantear que una retribución o subsidio o caridad pueda contribuir al voluntariado. Voluntario es el que dedica su tiempo libre, y esto sólo es posible si se tienen las necesidades básicas cubiertas.

Quizás sea una exageración decir que es para ricos, pero no lo es decir que al menos se debe perteneceer a clases o estratos medios, pudientes, para poder dedicarle ese tiempo.

De otra manera, se estaría ocultando trabajo rentado (precarizado, en 'negro', no formal, etc.).

¿No sería preferible que, entonces, en UK rentaran para tareas solidarias a los parados o desocupados? Creo que sería menos hipócrita de parte de ellos y no bastardearían las acciones de los voluntarios verdaderos.

Es mi opinión, espero leer alguna otra en Spanish. ¿O sólo los de habla inglesa realizan voluntariado?

Saludos Cordiales

Carlos


Posted by: Miguel Ortiz   Date: 18 January 2006 23:32   From: Zaragoza, España
El voluntario sólo puede encontrar la compensación a su trabajo en el ejercicio de la acción, esto es, en el desarrollo de sus ideales. Otro tipo de pago no coincide con la figura del voluntariado. No es imprescindible pertenecer a una clase acomodada, sí lo es tener unos ideales firmes y saber que no es mucho lo que se necesita para vivir.

Posted by: Adela   Date: 19 January 2006 15:58   From: Vigo, Spain
I think that those who say that volunteering is just for rich people have just an excuse for not being volunteers. You don't have to pay a plane ticket for going to Africa or other continent where you are not. You just have to look around and help people of your area, like taking care of children during weekends, or anything that you can do in your free time.

Those people who thinks that volunteering is something to be pay of, are in a big mistake. When you recieve money to do something related with volunteering, you have a job, or you are looking to be employed. That's the main difference.

Greetings from Spain to all of you.


Posted by: EDWIGE MINSI    Date: 19 January 2006 18:37   From: 
A cette question,et étant ressortissante d'un pays pauvre je ne pourais répondre que par l'affirmative dans la mesure où primo les informations quand elles arrivent ne sont pas à la disposition du grand public donc seules les personnes ayant des connaissances dans les différents services dans lesquels ces informations arrivent ont la primeur et sont avantageux.

Secundo,étant donné que nous sommes dans des pays où la corruption sévit comme la voie obligatoire l'information est de ce fait reservée à ceux qui ont suffisamment de moyens pour se la proprier:conséquence les pauvres et les démunis à cet effet ne pourront donc pas exercer comme volontaires dans les systèmes dans Nations Unies.


Posted by: Edith POUMALE   Date: 19 January 2006 19:43   From: 
A l'occasion du nouvel an 2006, je vous présente tous mes voeux de prospérité.

Je vous remercie très sincèrement de l'opportunité que vous m'avez offerte pour vous donner mon opinion par rapport au question posée. En effet, le volontariat ne concerne pas que les riches et privilégiés. C'est une affaire de tous mais les prauvres n'ont pas l'accè facile à cette fonction, hors eux aussi ils ont l'envie de mettre leur savoir faire au profit des autres et travailler comme volontaire pour lutter contre la pauvreté. Certaines personnes sont privilégiés par rapport à leur pays, à leur langue pour ne cité que celà.

Je lance un vivant appel pour une attention particulière soit porté à l'endroit des prauvres et les africains des pays sous-développé.

Vous en souhaitant bonne réception.


Posted by: CHEICK   Date: 21 January 2006 15:22   From: Kissidougou,GUINEA
When we talk of the word Volunteering simply means that, any activity somebody can undertake for his/her people without the hope or interest in getting money or making oneself rich out of it.

Briefly, the word Volunteering displays a special challenge for any good-natured patriot wishing to serve his/her communities in need, to improve self-esteem in developing countries and war torn countries. People in distress need good natured servants called Volunteers to help them revive and rebuild a home of confidence and stable peace.

I have the interest in serving the population that is yet novice about the word Volunteering.

The world need Volunteers with great love, education potentials, comunication and information skills to help the WORLD VOLUNTEER WEB reaching the message through sensitization and animation.

CHEICK OUSMANE FOFANA

LANGUAGE TRAINER

BP 79

UNHCR KISSIDOUGOU-GUINEA


Posted by: Vero   Date: 23 January 2006 22:14   From: Argentina
HOLA!

Queria agregar una opinion a todo lo que han ya escrito. Espero que entiendan el español, ya que he podido leer los comentarios de todos ustedes y la mayoria son en ingles, y espero haber interpretado bien. para la proxima se los prometo traducido..

Primero, en mi opinion no creo que el voluntariado sea algo de ricos, o de personas en mejor posicion creo que si se les diera la oportunidad de conocer lo que es el voluntariado, y tuvieran algo que los motive y obviamente el tiempo para hacerlo muchos mas lo harian, creo que hay muchos que por no tener una buena posicion economica tienen otras preocupaciones, y no tienen el tiempo para ser voluntarios. Pero no nos olvidemos que ser voluntarios no es barato, o no es gratis.. yo soy voluntaria desde hace 10 años, (y tengo 22), y he trabajado en distintas organizaciones, y por mas que la organización busque fondos de otras fundaciones, empresas,etc. los voluntarios corremos con los gastos. Y esto queramos o no es un punto en contra para que personas pobres lleven adelante un voluntariado. Pero NO CREO, que sea excluyente, y es mi segundo punto, todas las personas tenemos la posibilidad de comprometernos, y participar de esa manera, hay muchos grados para hacerlo.

Tambien creo que tiene mucho que ver la motivacion e impulso que se reciben desde nuestro ambiente, creo que la participacion se ve menor en sectores mas pobres, porque hay otras cosas en que preocuparse, PERO CREO QUE TAMBIEN ES COSA DE CHICOS "POBRES" EL TRABAJAR COMO VOLUNTARIOS. Y los vemos por ejemplo en mi ciudad en los barrios mas carenciados hay comedores, o centro de ayuda manejados por los mismos vecinos.

Espero ser clara..

y seguimos charlando...

Vero


Posted by: Raffa   Date: 26 January 2006 10:20   From: Italy
I am an agronomic Engineer and, so far, I have been working in development cooperation. I am 28 years old and I finished my studies at 25. Right now I am searching for a Job, possibly in development cooperation, although I am not averse at all to working as a volunteer (with all the financial implications it has), as I have done last year in Guatemala. You should see, in all the offers of organizations looking for help, how many seek for totally voluntary and financially independent people. What I would like to know is how one is supposed to go on eating and living if he doesn't get paid, even a minimum, for his work? I am a qualified, relatively experienced (comparing with my age)...could anyone explain to me why, for a specialized worker (generally they ask for many years of field experience and great qualifications and a number of languages, very young of course!...some sort of alien), only because you offer your work for non-profit causes, you are supposed to live on fresh air? In many cases, even worse, you are supposed to finance your flight etc etc....it is not viable. I think there should be government programs financing these initiatives, so as to bring more people to do so. People are normally not very attracted to this stuff...with the existing mechanism, there is no way it is gonna attract many more....apart from the very rich, who do not need it anyway!

Posted by: Jamie   Date: 30 January 2006 02:12   From: Scotland
I am very much in the same boat. I am a mechanical engineering student interested in working within developing countries but it is financially impossible.

It is important to realise the last thing developed nations want to lose is qualified individuals. This boils down to exactly what many people have discussed on this forum previously: money. A person can be qualified to great extent but this is of no help without financial backing. I would love to make a difference in these countries, but without money (and people governing that money is moving to worthwile causes) it is folly.

Rid the countries of corruption, campaign for backing from the wealthy to fund the right resources, find the right people to make use of these resources.

They have the manpower but not the resources. If you want to make a difference, make a fortune in the west and spend half of it making sure the money gets to the people that need it.

Jamie Ward


Posted by: Sarah   Date: 30 January 2006 20:03   From: México
Sí hablamos de los programas internacionales de voluntariado, creo que no están al alcance de cualquier persona y mucho menos en la mente de aquéllas personas que como dice el artículo no tienen o apenas tienen lo necesario para subsistir, sin embargo el voluntariado lo hacen aquéllas personas que desean compartir lo que son y tienen con quien lo necesita y para eso no es necesario tener un enorme capital sino más bien saber mirar fuera de ti mismo para conocer y entender las necesidades del otro, lo he visto cuando suceden catástrofes naturales en mi país, quien más voluntad tiene de dar y ayudar es generalmente quien ha padecido lo mismo, la gente de escasos recursos, es quien más se solidariza y ayuda a quien sabe que está en peores condiciones.

Saludos desde México


Posted by: Huy   Date: 02 February 2006 17:41   From: USA
Do these outfits want to get hard currency from Americans and boss them around in the hot sun in Africa?

As a "volunteer" I should not have to incur costs of any kind. It isn't and should not be my concern how much it costs to organize, plan, feed, clothe, house etc. volunteers. A volunteer leaves his/her job, studies, family, to travel and work for free for the benefit of others, and you ask him/her to PAY for it! I call that chutzpah.

For that $ I could stay in a hotel + eat caviar & drink champagnia for 2 weeks and NOT work.

Paying to volunteer makes no sense, and is a contradiction in terms. It's like paying my boss to work for him instead of the other way around (especially since volunteers DO NOT get paid!).

Haven't you considered that volunteers have rent, heat, electric, phone, etc. bills to pay and might not be too crazy about shelling out hundreds or even thousands of dollars to fly off somewhere and work for no pay? The work is usually in a hostile environment, detrimental to the workers' safety and health.

I am not volunteering to go on an archaeological expedition for my own health; it is for the benefit of mankind to learn from the past.

If you waive all fees, count me in.

bolshoyhuy@hotmail.com


Posted by: Christophe MANZANGA   Date: 07 February 2006 17:44   From: Kinshasa/DRC
MON COMMENTAIRE PORTE SUR UNE QUESTION LIEE AU FAIT QU'AUJOURD'HUI, IL N'EST PAS FACILE à UN JEUNE D'UN PAYS EN VOIE DE DEVELOPPEMENT D'ACCEDER à CERTAINS AVANTAGES QUE PEUT LUI OFFRIR LE VOLONTARIAT à CAUSE DE SA SITUATION SOCIALE.

AINSI, SANS VOULOIR CONFIRMER L4AFFIRMATION SELON LAQUELLE LE VOLONTARIAT EST PLUS POUR LES RICHES QUE LES PAUVRES, JE DIRAIS PLUTOT QUE L'ACCES AU VOLONATRIAT ET à SES AVANTAGES EST BEAUCOUP LUS FACIL à UNE PERSONNE à REVENU ELEVE QU'à CELUI à REVENU FAIBLE.

MERCI


Posted by: gina   Date: 14 February 2006 00:59   From: Tegucigalpa, Honduras
Of course! I do strongly believe that volunteerism is for the wealthy but not necessarily for the young, however, I have tried working for the UN office in my country, and they are selfish in knowing the realities of my country, and making you volunteer entirely for free, they don’t pay your expenses in the same area where you live like transport or food, if you have the will to help your country, for a better future, why is it there no sponsorship for young people, who have passion for others?

And for instance, rich people can only be perceived as the only helpers for others, of course because they can afford...


Posted by: danilo   Date: 06 April 2006 16:32   From: presently living in turkey
i want to volunteer for humanitarian reason. why do i have to pay?




  Related articles and resources
Read also:
Related resources:

 

Email page   Email page            Print page